+38 (093) 750-61-02

Телефон

Аналітичні матеріали за тематикою застосування практики ЄСПЛ

  • Головна |
  • Аналітичні матеріали за тематикою застосування практики ЄСПЛ

В даному розділі Ви можете ознайомитись з матеріалами підготовленими Інститутом, його експертами, інші дослідження за тематикою застосування ЄКПЛ та ЄСПЛ.

  1. Аналітичний звіт за результатами моніторингу судових рішень щодо застосування в Україні положень Конвенції про захист прав людини і основоположних свобод та практики Європейського суду з прав людини (2018);
  2. Звіт за результатами громадського моніторингу застосування Верховним Судом практики Європейського суду з прав людини (2019).
  3. Посібник для суддів, прокурорів, авдокатів (провідні рішення стаття 2 Конвенції) (2020).
  4. JUDICIAL REVIEW UNDER THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT: A CULTURE OF JUSTIFICATIO. Author THOMAS RAINE;
  5. Hungary: The Europeanization of Judicial Review (Authors: Andras Kovacs and Marton Varju);
  6. The European Court of Human Rights and the German Federal Constitutional Court (Author: Angelika Nußberger);
  7. The Protection of Human Rights in the Decisions of the Italian Supreme Court of Cassation (Author Hon. Antonio Brancaccio (2012);
  8. The European Court of Human Rights and National Courts: A Constructive Conversation or a Dialogue of Disrespect? (Author Robert Spano 2015);
  9. The Value of the European Court of Human Rights to the United Kingdom (Author Merris Amos 2017);
  10. The Transformative Power of the European Court of Human Rights (Author Janneke Gerards 2017);
  11. Overview of the Court’s case-law (2016);
  12. International and national courts confronting large-scale violations of human rights (Judge Ksenija Turković European Court of Human Rights Opening of the Judicial Year – Seminar – 29 January 2016);
  13. OVERVIEW OF THE CASE-LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (2015);
  14. THE FUTURE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS: Facing the backlog challenge (Ingediend door Alexander H. G. Verstraete 2013-2014);
  15. INTERIM OPINION ON THE AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Adopted by the Venice Commission at its 106th Plenary Session (Venice, 11-12 March 2016) Opinion № 832/2015;
  16. Практика Європейського суду з прав людини в діяльності органів прокуратури і суду: виклики та перспективи: матеріали І Міжнародної науково-практичної конференції (13 червня 2018 року). – Київ: Національна академія прокуратури України, 2018. – 206 с.( Укладачі: Мінченко С.І., Попов Г.В., Гладун О.З., Плотнікова В.П., Барандич С.П. );
  17. Review of Efficiency in Criminal Proceedings (Sir Brian Leveson President of the Queen’s Bench Division 2015);
  18. USING THE ECHR IN IRISH COURTS: MORE WHISPER THAN BANG? (Dr Fiona de Londras 2011);
  19. Comparing Constitutional Adjudication A Summer School on Comparative Interpretation of European Constitutional Jurisprudence 4th Edition – 2009;
  20. International Judicial Legitimacy: Lessons from National Courts (Yonatan Lupu);
  21. STANDARDIZATION OF JUDICIAL PRACTICE IN ITALY (Andrea Salvatore Romito, Clara Tracogna);
  22. Judicial Behavior on International Courts: The European Court of Human Rights (Erik Voeten);
  23. An English Judge in Europe(Hon. Lady Justice Arden);
  24. Judicial_Accountabilities_in_New_Europe_Intro;
  25. If International Judges Say So, It Must Be True: Empiricism or Fetishism? (2015);
  26. The Dutch Supreme Court: A Reluctant Positive Legislator? (J. Uzman, T. Barkhuysen & M.L. van Emmerik);
  27. Courts and Consociations, or How Human Rights Courts May De-stabilize Power-sharing Settlements (Christopher McCrudden and Brendan O’Leary);
  28. Draft text on possible alternative models (Mr Ota HLINOMAZ (Czech Republic);
  29. Guide to good practice in respect of domestic remedies (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 18 September 2013);
  30. Do European Court of Human Rights Judgments Promote Legal and Policy Change? (Laurence R. Helfer , Erik Voeten);
  31. Керівництво з належної практики щодо національних засобів правового захисту (ухвалено Комітетом Міністрів 18 вересня 2013 року);
  32. Human rights and the UK constitution (Colm O’Cinneide September 2012);
  33. Human rights concepts in EU Human Rights Dialogues (Balázs Majtényi, Lorena Sosa, Alexandra Timmer);
  34. The Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights Limits and Ways Ahead (Déborah Forst);
  35. Judicial Dialogue and the Cross-Fertilization of Legal Systems: The European Court of Justice (FRANCIS G. JACOBS);
  36. Who Has the Last Word on the Protection of Human Rights in Europe? (Julia Laffranque);
  37. European Judicial Cooperation and Fundamental Rights: Practical Guidelines;
  38. The European Court of Human Rights And National Courts: A Constructive Conversation or A Dialogue of Disrespect? (Judge Robert Spano European Court of Human Rights);
  39. Measuring judicial quality – Developing the EU Justice Scoreboard (Discussion paper);
  40. Quality Over Quantity: Amici Influence and Judicial Decision Making (JANET M. BOX-STEFFENSMEIER , DINO P. CHRISTENSON , MATTHEW P. HITT);
  41. Citations in Supreme Court Opinions and Briefs: A Comparative Study (William H. Manz);
  42. Court decisions in commercial matters: an EBRD assessment (ALAN COLMAN);
  43. Judicial Tactics in the European Court of Human Rights (Shai Dothan,2011);
  44. USING THE ECHR IN IRISH COURTS: MORE WHISPER THAN BANG? (Dr Fiona de Londras,2011);
  45. JUDGMENT NO. 49 YEAR 2015 [omitted] THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF ITALY;
  46. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Council of Europe support to the implementation of the ECHR at national level (REPORT Directorate of Internal Oversight Evaluation Division Evaluation (2017)20 30 January 2017);
  47. GOODHART-1959-The_Modern_Law_Review;
  48. IS THE ENGLISH DOCTRINE OF JUDICIAL PRECEDENT BECOMING ONLY AN ILLUSION? (ROMAN KALIŠ);
  49. (ROBERT G SCOFIELD) GOODHART’S CONCESSION: DEFENDING RATIO DECIDENDI FROM LOGICAL POSITIVISM AND LEGAL REALISM IN THE FIRST HALF OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY;
  50. Montrose-1957-The_Modern_Law_Review;
  51. THEORIZING PRECEDENT IN INTERNATIONAL LAW Interpretation in International Law (Andrea Bianchi, Daniel Peat & Matthew Windsor, eds., Oxford University Press, forthcoming). HARLAN GRANT COHEN;
  52. Independent yet accountable: stress test lessons for the European Court of Human Rights (Andreas Follesdal);
  53. The Effect of Subsequent Practice on the European Convention on Human Rights: Considerations from a General International Law Perspective (Anja Seibert-Fohr);
  54. Codified Canons and the Common Law of Interpretation (JACOB SCOTT);
  55. Universality or Diversity of Human Rights? Strasbourg in the Age of Subsidiarity (Robert Spano);
  56. Anja Seibert – Fohrand Prof. Dr. Mark E. Villiger (e d s.) Judgments o f the European Court o f Human Rights – Effects and Implementation;
  57. The Judicial Application of Human Rights Law in Turkey (İnsan Hakları , Hukukunun Türk Yargısındaki Uygulaması, Ayşe ÖZKAN DUVAN);
  58. Why Do States Comply (or Not Comply) with Human Rights Treaties?;
  59. ЗАХИСТ ПРАВ ЛЮДИНИ В АДМІНІСТРАТИВНОМУ СУДОЧИНСТВІ: СУЧАСНИЙ СТАН І ПЕРСПЕКТИВИ РОЗВИТКУ В УКРАЇНІ До 10-ї річниці процесуальної діяльності адміністративних судів України Збірник матеріалів конференції м. Київ, 1 – 2 жовтня 2015 року;
  60. STEERING COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (CDDH) CDDH report on the longer-term future of the system of the European Convention on Human Rights __ 84th meeting 7–11 December 2015;
  61. Bundesverfassungsrichterin Professor Dr. Gertrude Lübbe-Wolff, LL.M. (Harvard), Karlsruhe ECtHR and national jurisdiction – The Görgülü Case;
  62. (Hannes Vallikivi) Status of International Law in the Estonian Legal System under the 1992 Constitution;
  63. European Court of the Human Rights – Court of fourth instance in Estonia? (Eerik Kergandberg);
  64. Implementation of the European Court of Human Rights’ judgments concerning national minorities or why declaratory adjudication does not help (Nicholas Sitaropoulos);
  65. THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL REORDERING (Alec Stone Sweet);
  66. Effective use of national remedies in domestic legal proceedings in the Balkan region and the subsidiary role of the European Court of Human Rights(Council of Europe);
  67. Is Fairchild a Leading case of the Common Law? (Per Laleng);
  68. WHAT MAKES A LEADING CASE? THE NARROW LENS OF THE LAW OR A WIDER PERSPECTIVE? (Hon Susan Glazebrook);
  69. METHODOLOGY ON CARRYING OUT MONITORING OF JUDGEMENTS ON APPLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE CASE-LAW OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS BY JUDGES IN UKRAINE ( developed by the OSCE Project Co-ordinator in Ukraine in cooperation with the Public organization “Institute of applied humanitarian research” within the “Safeguarding Human Rights through Court” Project implemented with nancial support from the Government of Canada.);
  70. (Фулей Т.І.) Застосування практики Європейського суду з прав людини в адміністратив- ному судочинстві: Науково-методичний посібник для суддів. 2-ге вид. випр., допов. – К., 2015. – 128 с. ISBN 978-966-2310-23-8;
  71. (Фулей Т.І.) Застосування практики Європейського суду з прав людини при здійсненні правосуддя: Науково-методичний посібник для суддів. – 2-ге вид. випр., допов. – К., 2015. – 208 с. ISBN 978-966-2310-29-0;
  72. (Maja Nastić, LL.D.) ECHR AND NATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL COURTS;
  73. Is the European Convention Going to Be ‘Supreme’? A Comparative-Constitutional Overview of ECHR and EU Law before National Courts (Giuseppe Martinico);
  74. Borrowing and non-Borrowing among International Courts (Erik Voeten);
  75. HUMAN RIGHTS INTERNATIONAL LAW SYMPOSIUM: ARTICLE: A TYPOLOGY OF TRANSJUDICIAL COMMUNICATION (Anne-Marie Slaughter);
  76. The Doctrine of Precedent in English and Norwegian Law – Some Common and Specific Features (Svein Eng);
  77. Reception of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) in Poland and Switzerland (Helen Keller);
  78. Укрепление национальных механизмов имплементации Европейской Конвенции по Правам Человека: оценка национального опыта Швейцарии (Шарль-Эдуар Хельд);
  79. THE CONSTITUTION, THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 2003 AND THE DISTRICT COURT – A PERSONAL VIEW FROM A JUDICIAL PERSPECTIVE (JUDGE THOMAS E. O’DONNELL);
  80. The UK and the European Court of Human Rights (Alice Donald, Jane Gordon and Philip Leach);
  81. DO JUDGESMEET THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATION TO SETTLE DISPUTES IN CONFORMITY WITH ‘PRINCIPLES OF JUSTICE AND INTERNATIONAL LAW’? (Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann);
  82. THE CONSTITUTIONAL RELEVANCE OF THE ECHR IN DOMESTIC AND EUROPEAN LAW An Italian Perspective (Giorgio REPETTO);
  83. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OF THE JUDGMENTS OF THE ECtHR IN NATIONAL CASE-LAW A comparative analysis (Janneke GERARDS, Joseph FLEUREN).